Editorial Principles & Review Methodology

At CompareVPNPrices, our mission is simple: help you choose a VPN you can trust. To do that, we combine hands-on testing with strict editorial standards so our recommendations are fair, transparent, and useful.

How We Test VPNs

We evaluate every VPN through repeatable, real-world checks. Each review reflects fresh test data gathered under consistent conditions.

Test Environment

1) Speed & Stability

We measure raw performance and variability, not just a single "best case" number.

2) Security & Privacy Checks

Safety isn't negotiable. We verify claims and look for leaks.

3) Streaming & Unblocking

We test popular platforms and consistency across regions.

4) Apps, Features & Ease of Use

The best VPN is the one you'll actually enjoy using.

5) Support, Pricing & Value

We look beyond the headline price.

Our Editorial Standards

Independence

Our reviews are based on what we find in testing—full stop. We don't sell positive coverage, and advertisers don't preview or edit our conclusions.

Transparency

If a link could earn us a commission, you'll know. We clearly mark affiliate links and sponsorships so you can make an informed choice.

Accuracy

VPNs change fast. We retest and update pages regularly so ratings reflect current performance and features.

Completeness

Every review covers the major features and trade-offs so you understand where a VPN excels and where it falls short.

Corrections

If we make a mistake, we'll fix it promptly and note what changed.

Affiliate Disclosure

CompareVPNPrices is reader-supported. Some links on our site are affiliate links—if you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This supports our independent testing and lets us keep content free.

How We Make Money

What this means for you

Review Update Policy

We don't "publish and forget." We keep reviews current through:

Scoring Overview (How We Weigh Things)

While weights can shift as the market evolves, we generally consider:

We publish the latest scoring rationale inside each review when weights differ (for example, on privacy-focused roundups).